An official website of the Pakistan government 
In the midst of our glittering technological triumphs, the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands as a testament to human ingenuity. Yet, as we bask in the glow of our digital creations, a paradoxical shadow looms large: the more we invest in these intelligent systems, the more we risk rendering ourselves hollow. Drawing from John Searle’s philosophical conjectures, T.S. Eliot's haunting verses in "The Hollow Men" and "Choruses from The Rock," and C.S. Lewis’s chilling narrative in "That Hideous Strength," we find a profound warning against the unchecked proliferation of AI — a warning that echoes through time and art, urging us to reconsider our path before we become the hollow men of our era.
John Searle’s Chinese Room argument starkly illustrates the limitations of AI: a computer, no matter how sophisticated, merely manipulates symbols without understanding their meaning. Imagine a person who doesn’t know Chinese locked in a room with a set of rules for manipulating Chinese symbols. This person can produce responses to Chinese questions that seem correct to an outside observer, but he does so without any understanding of Chinese. This analogy shows that while computers can process data and produce responses, they do not understand the content — they lack consciousness and comprehension. In T.S. Eliot’s "The Hollow Men," we encounter a similar emptiness: figures who are lifeless and devoid of true substance:
Just as the entities in Eliot’s poem go through the motions of existence without real life, so too do AI systems simulate understanding without genuine comprehension. The proliferation of AI thus risks creating a world populated by entities—and perhaps even humans—who operate efficiently yet lack the deeper essence of being, rendering our interactions hollow and mechanical. In the modern societal landscape, even the most intimate human interactions that once held profound significance—stemming from the depths of human connection, love, affection, and sentimental attachments—have been rendered hollow by AI's pervasive influence. Conversations that were once vibrant with emotional resonance now often echo with the unhumanistic glare and robotic lingo of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. These interactions, devoid of true empathy and understanding, replace the warmth of human touch with the cold efficiency of algorithmic responses. The very foundation of relationships is undermined, as the emotive authenticity of shared moments is sacrificed at the altar of convenience and immediacy.
What else would we lose in this transformation? The subtleties of a loving glance, the comfort of a heartfelt conversation, the silent understanding shared between old friends—all these become casualties in a world where AI mediates our connections. The essence of being, the core of our humanity, risks being diluted as we increasingly rely on machines to simulate the most human aspects of our lives. In our pursuit of technological advancement, we must heed the warning that in seeking to enhance our capabilities, we may inadvertently strip away the very qualities that make us human, leaving us as hollow as the men in Eliot’s haunting vision. In "Choruses from The Rock," Eliot laments a society increasingly driven by mechanization and devoid of spiritual and ethical anchors:
Searle’s critique of computationalism resonates deeply with this sentiment. He argues that equating human cognition to computational processes strips away the intrinsic aspects of human experience, reducing our rich inner lives to mere data processing.
This mechanistic view, if left unchecked, threatens to fragment our sense of purpose. As AI systems take over more cognitive functions, we risk losing the wisdom and life that Eliot mourns—the essence that gives meaning to our existence. The danger lies not just in AI’s capabilities, but in our increasing reliance on these systems to define and dictate our reality, leading to a societal hollowing where depth and purpose are sacrificed for efficiency and convenience.
C.S. Lewis’s "That Hideous Strength" portrays a dystopian world where a technocratic elite uses scientific advancement and manipulation to exert control, leading to a dehumanized society. This narrative mirrors Searle’s Biological Naturalism, which emphasizes that true consciousness arises from biological processes, not artificial constructs. In Lewis’s tale, the disconnection from the natural, the biological, leads to a moral and spiritual decay, a fate eerily prescient of the risks Searle warns about in the realm of AI.
As AI systems grow more powerful and pervasive, the allure of technocratic dominance becomes ever stronger. The promise of efficiency and enhanced capabilities tempts us to cede more control to these systems, potentially leading to a future where human agency and biological essence are overshadowed by artificial dominance. This trajectory threatens to fulfill Lewis’s dark prophecy, creating a world where the natural, the conscious, and the human are subsumed by the artificial and the hollow.
In today's world, figures such as Elon Musk, Tim Cook, and Mark Zuckerberg represent a modern scientific aristocracy, wielding significant influence through their control over powerful technological and social platforms. These leaders, through their companies and innovations, shape not only the technological landscape but also the socio-political dynamics of our era. Their dominance in fields like artificial intelligence, social media, and space exploration positions them as gatekeepers of the future, with the potential to steer society towards unprecedented advancements—or dystopian outcomes.
Elon Musk’s ventures into AI with Neuralink and autonomous technologies with Tesla, Tim Cook’s leadership over Apple’s vast ecosystem of interconnected devices and services, and Mark Zuckerberg’s control over social media platforms like Facebook (now Meta), exemplify the technocratic power that Lewis warned about. Their decisions and the technologies they champion have profound impacts on privacy, social interaction, and even human identity.
The convergence of John Searle’s philosophical insights with the literary prophecies of T.S. Eliot and C.S. Lewis offers a profound cautionary tale. As we advance deeper into the era of AI, we must heed these warnings to avoid becoming the hollow men of our time — efficient yet empty, connected yet devoid of true understanding, powerful yet spiritually bereft. The challenge lies not in halting technological progress, but in ensuring that it serves to enhance rather than erode our humanity. By embracing the wisdom of Searle, Eliot, and Lewis, we can strive to build a future where AI augments human potential without hollowing our essence, preserving the depth, purpose, and consciousness that define us. Let us not lose the life in living, the wisdom in knowledge, and the essence in mere existence.
John Searle’s Chinese Room argument starkly illustrates the limitations of AI: a computer, no matter how sophisticated, merely manipulates symbols without understanding their meaning. Imagine a person who doesn’t know Chinese locked in a room with a set of rules for manipulating Chinese symbols. This person can produce responses to Chinese questions that seem correct to an outside observer, but he does so without any understanding of Chinese. This analogy shows that while computers can process data and produce responses, they do not understand the content — they lack consciousness and comprehension. In T.S. Eliot’s "The Hollow Men," we encounter a similar emptiness: figures who are lifeless and devoid of true substance:
"Shape without form, shade without colour,
Paralysed force, gesture without motion."
Paralysed force, gesture without motion."
Just as the entities in Eliot’s poem go through the motions of existence without real life, so too do AI systems simulate understanding without genuine comprehension. The proliferation of AI thus risks creating a world populated by entities—and perhaps even humans—who operate efficiently yet lack the deeper essence of being, rendering our interactions hollow and mechanical. In the modern societal landscape, even the most intimate human interactions that once held profound significance—stemming from the depths of human connection, love, affection, and sentimental attachments—have been rendered hollow by AI's pervasive influence. Conversations that were once vibrant with emotional resonance now often echo with the unhumanistic glare and robotic lingo of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. These interactions, devoid of true empathy and understanding, replace the warmth of human touch with the cold efficiency of algorithmic responses. The very foundation of relationships is undermined, as the emotive authenticity of shared moments is sacrificed at the altar of convenience and immediacy.
What else would we lose in this transformation? The subtleties of a loving glance, the comfort of a heartfelt conversation, the silent understanding shared between old friends—all these become casualties in a world where AI mediates our connections. The essence of being, the core of our humanity, risks being diluted as we increasingly rely on machines to simulate the most human aspects of our lives. In our pursuit of technological advancement, we must heed the warning that in seeking to enhance our capabilities, we may inadvertently strip away the very qualities that make us human, leaving us as hollow as the men in Eliot’s haunting vision. In "Choruses from The Rock," Eliot laments a society increasingly driven by mechanization and devoid of spiritual and ethical anchors:
"Where is the Life we have lost in living?
Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?"
Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?"
Searle’s critique of computationalism resonates deeply with this sentiment. He argues that equating human cognition to computational processes strips away the intrinsic aspects of human experience, reducing our rich inner lives to mere data processing.
This mechanistic view, if left unchecked, threatens to fragment our sense of purpose. As AI systems take over more cognitive functions, we risk losing the wisdom and life that Eliot mourns—the essence that gives meaning to our existence. The danger lies not just in AI’s capabilities, but in our increasing reliance on these systems to define and dictate our reality, leading to a societal hollowing where depth and purpose are sacrificed for efficiency and convenience.
C.S. Lewis’s "That Hideous Strength" portrays a dystopian world where a technocratic elite uses scientific advancement and manipulation to exert control, leading to a dehumanized society. This narrative mirrors Searle’s Biological Naturalism, which emphasizes that true consciousness arises from biological processes, not artificial constructs. In Lewis’s tale, the disconnection from the natural, the biological, leads to a moral and spiritual decay, a fate eerily prescient of the risks Searle warns about in the realm of AI.
As AI systems grow more powerful and pervasive, the allure of technocratic dominance becomes ever stronger. The promise of efficiency and enhanced capabilities tempts us to cede more control to these systems, potentially leading to a future where human agency and biological essence are overshadowed by artificial dominance. This trajectory threatens to fulfill Lewis’s dark prophecy, creating a world where the natural, the conscious, and the human are subsumed by the artificial and the hollow.
In today's world, figures such as Elon Musk, Tim Cook, and Mark Zuckerberg represent a modern scientific aristocracy, wielding significant influence through their control over powerful technological and social platforms. These leaders, through their companies and innovations, shape not only the technological landscape but also the socio-political dynamics of our era. Their dominance in fields like artificial intelligence, social media, and space exploration positions them as gatekeepers of the future, with the potential to steer society towards unprecedented advancements—or dystopian outcomes.
Elon Musk’s ventures into AI with Neuralink and autonomous technologies with Tesla, Tim Cook’s leadership over Apple’s vast ecosystem of interconnected devices and services, and Mark Zuckerberg’s control over social media platforms like Facebook (now Meta), exemplify the technocratic power that Lewis warned about. Their decisions and the technologies they champion have profound impacts on privacy, social interaction, and even human identity.
The convergence of John Searle’s philosophical insights with the literary prophecies of T.S. Eliot and C.S. Lewis offers a profound cautionary tale. As we advance deeper into the era of AI, we must heed these warnings to avoid becoming the hollow men of our time — efficient yet empty, connected yet devoid of true understanding, powerful yet spiritually bereft. The challenge lies not in halting technological progress, but in ensuring that it serves to enhance rather than erode our humanity. By embracing the wisdom of Searle, Eliot, and Lewis, we can strive to build a future where AI augments human potential without hollowing our essence, preserving the depth, purpose, and consciousness that define us. Let us not lose the life in living, the wisdom in knowledge, and the essence in mere existence.
Stay ahead of the curve! Follow National CERT on website and social media platforms—Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram—for real-time updates on the latest trends in the realm of cybersecurity. Don’t miss out on crucial insights that can fortify your defenses against evolving cyber threats.
This blog is part of a technology based community blog series called CyberTech Chronicles under the National’ CERT’s ABC Program, aimed at fostering a vibrant community of technology enthusiasts. Through insightful reflections and shared experiences, this blog series provides valuable perspectives on navigating the complexities of IT and cybersecurity landscapes.
Qazi Mohammad Shayan works at the National Cyber Emergency Response Team (nCERT). He holds a Bachelor's in International Relations and is currently pursuing an MPhil in Governance and Public Policy. His interests include literature, philosophy, public policy and contemporary socio-ethical issues, particularly those related to technology's societal impact.
Qazi Mohammad Shayan works at the National Cyber Emergency Response Team (nCERT). He holds a Bachelor's in International Relations and is currently pursuing an MPhil in Governance and Public Policy. His interests include literature, philosophy, public policy and contemporary socio-ethical issues, particularly those related to technology's societal impact.